This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
noforg [2016/06/01 15:31] matei.popovici |
noforg [2016/06/30 16:45] (current) matei.popovici |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ===== Strategy definition ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | $\hat{s}_A(\hat{h}) = s_A(h) $ (or equivalently $=s_A(last(\hat{h}))$). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Some examples ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the induction step of $\langle B \rangle \varphi$ where $\varphi$ contains cooperation modalities, we want to replace each outermost occurrence of $\xi = \langle A \rangle \gamma$ in $\varphi$ by a proposition $p_\xi$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For simplicity, suppose we only have one such occurrence $\xi$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We also need to modify the model $M$ to $M^\xi$, such that: | ||
+ | the original formula holds in $M$ iff the transformed one holds in $M^\xi$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We schematically illustrate four such transformations on models. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Example 1 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In $M$, $\alpha$ is an action profile (action profiles are not illustrated if they are not important). | ||
+ | Suppose $012\models \langle A \rangle p$. In the transformed model, we label state $012$ by $p_\xi$. | ||
+ | {{nf-1.jpg}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Example 2 ==== | ||
+ | In $M$, $\xi=\langle A \rangle G a$. We have $012^+ \models \xi$. In the transformed model, we have an infinite number of states, each one corresponding to a history $012..2$. They are all labelled with $p_\xi$. | ||
+ | {{nf-2.jpg}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Example 3 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The model $M$ shows that, in some situations, we may need to create states which do not correspond to histories per se. | ||
+ | {{nf-3.jpg}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Example 4 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Another interesting example. | ||
+ | {{nf-4.jpg}} | ||
===== Fixing tree proofs ====== | ===== Fixing tree proofs ====== | ||
Line 5: | Line 39: | ||
- Let $h'=hh''$ (i.e. $h'$ extends $h$ by some history) be a history such that $M,h'\models \xi$. | - Let $h'=hh''$ (i.e. $h'$ extends $h$ by some history) be a history such that $M,h'\models \xi$. | ||
- We remove from $M$ all states $q = h''[i]$ (i.e. all states from the extension $h''$) | - We remove from $M$ all states $q = h''[i]$ (i.e. all states from the extension $h''$) | ||
- | * For each $h^*$ such that: | + | - For each $h^*$ such that: |
- | * $h^*$ extends $h$ | + | - $h^*$ extends $h$ |
- | * $last(h^*) = last(h')$ | + | - $last(h^*) = last(h')$ |
- | * create a unique state $h^*$ in $M^\xi$. Each such state corresponds to a "road" starting with $h$ and leading to the "point" where $\xi$ holds. | + | - create a unique state $h^*$ in $M^\xi$. Each such state corresponds to a "road" starting with $h$ and leading to the "point" where $\xi$ holds. |
- | * add transitions exactly as in the unfolding. | + | - add transitions exactly as in the unfolding. |
- | * add indistinguishability relations as in the unfolding. | + | - add indistinguishability relations as in the unfolding. |
- | * Label this state $h^*$ with all propositions in $last(h^*)$. Additionally, if $h^*=h'$, label it with $p_\xi$. | + | - Label this state $h^*$ with all propositions in $last(h^*)$. Additionally, if $h^*=h'$, label it with $p_\xi$. |
- | * This process is repeated for each $h'$, and "duplicate" states $h^*$ can be "merged" | + | - This process is repeated for each $h'$, and "duplicate" states $h^*$ can be "merged" |
The construction $M^{\xi}$ //partially unfolds// $M$, and creates unique states for all histories starting with $h$, and ending with $last(h')$, for all $h'$ satisfying the above condition. | The construction $M^{\xi}$ //partially unfolds// $M$, and creates unique states for all histories starting with $h$, and ending with $last(h')$, for all $h'$ satisfying the above condition. |